首页> 外文OA文献 >How to measure greenhouse gas emissions by fuel type for binary sustainability standards: Average or Marginal emissions? An example of fertilizer use and corn ethanol
【2h】

How to measure greenhouse gas emissions by fuel type for binary sustainability standards: Average or Marginal emissions? An example of fertilizer use and corn ethanol

机译:如何根据二元可持续性标准的燃料类型测量温室气体排放:平均或边际排放?肥料使用和玉米乙醇的一个例子

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study proposed a modelling framework which addresses various issues such as decreasing marginal yield of corn with respect to fertilizer use in biofuel production and the resulting greenhouse gas emissions. Particularly, the framework considered exogenous changes including oil price development and biofuel policy through market interactions of different inputs and outputs in biofuel production. We applied the modelling framework numerically in an example of corn ethanol production in the United States to illustrate how the economics of fertilizer use could impact the GHG emissions based on both average and marginal emissions. The results show that higher oil prices increase the prices of gasoline, natural gas, ethanol, and corn, which stimulates corn-based ethanol production and increases corn yields by encouraging profit-maximizing farmers to increase their application rate of nitrogen fertilizers slightly. The effect is that, on average, GHG emissions per unit of produced corn ethanol remain almost constant if oil price increases from 60 to 120 $/barrel.However, the marginal emissions per additional unit of ethanol production increase by 2.2% or10%, depending on whether the Volumetric Ethanol Excise Tax Credit is implemented or not. More important is that the marginal emissions of corn ethanol are much higher than those of conventional gasoline. Although on average there are GHG emission savings of corn ethanol compared to conventional gasoline, the savings are negative when based on the marginal emissions of corn ethanol. An interesting implication is that the effectiveness of biofuel policies aimed at reducing GHG emissions might be questionable.
机译:这项研究提出了一个建模框架,该框架解决了各种问题,例如与在生物燃料生产中使用肥料有关的玉米边际产量降低以及由此产生的温室气体排放。特别是,该框架考虑了外源性变化,包括通过生物燃料生产中不同投入和产出的市场互动产生的石油价格发展和生物燃料政策。我们以美国玉米乙醇生产为例,对模型框架进行了数值计算,以说明基于平均排放量和边际排放量,化肥使用的经济状况如何影响温室气体排放量。结果表明,较高的油价提高了汽油,天然气,乙醇和玉米的价格,这通过鼓励利润最大化的农民略微提高其氮肥的施用量而刺激了玉米基乙醇的生产并提高了玉米单产。结果是,如果油价从60美元/桶提高到120美元/桶,则每单位生产的玉米乙醇的温室气体排放量平均几乎保持不变,但是每增加一单位乙醇生产的边际排放量增加2.2%或10%,具体取决于是否实施了乙醇消费税税收抵免。更重要的是玉米乙醇的边际排放量远高于传统汽油。尽管与常规汽油相比,玉米乙醇的温室气体排放平均减少,但以玉米乙醇的边际排放量为基础,该减少为负。一个有趣的含义是,旨在减少温室气体排放的生物燃料政策的有效性可能值得怀疑。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号